youch.

this is not my expertise and I have no bones in the discussion. Do you not think population size would have a lot to do with how much healthcare would be needed? How could it not correlate? I'm just saying it would be very complicated to determine, outside the scope of discussion.

I mean how much "healthcare" do they have to handle? Patients, perhaps. Comparing systems of different sizes, you expect less efficiency from a larger system. The comparison would have to be quite complicated simply to determine that difference, esp with such different behavior. We could go by population.

I don't think healthcare systems are going to be good. How big is the AUS healthcare system compared to US (something not money)?

otoh, if you don't make much money, you don't pay taxes. There are programs to handle large debts and exorbitant healthcare expenses for the uninsured, to fill the gap. Many things like this are not givens; they have to be applied for.

//

10C isn't the name, though…

I think you might want to consider micro-optimizing your platform. Perhaps rename it "Millennium". Or maybe "Kiloyear".

he is doing pretty well. I prefer Keillor, but… that can't be avoided. :)

API access speed changes depending on what level of payment a user is making to 10Centuries?

Oh, interesting!